E-mail Updates

  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

We're Twittering

    follow us on Twitter

    « Advocating Adoption | Main | The Week in Pictures, part 1 »

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    teaginny

    My feelings on families with lots of kids - see previous post. I hope all Christians will at least consider adoption as a way to build their families. There are so many children who need families, and what a wonderful way to share Christ's love with them and picture it to the world!

    Brooke

    This is definately a contraversial topic! It's just harder when you know it's not working well for the family. But I love your take on it! I love that God knew this from the beginning and gave this "job" for Adam and Eve to procreate. It seems like so many of the worlds religions recognize this and build up their army from kids. Lets make Kingdom kids and raise ours up to be godly warriors!

    Debra

    This is from the person whose tweet you quoted here. I came across your tweet by chance and decided to respond to it by using my newly-established twitter account. I wasn't even sure if my message was received, so imagine my surprise when I came to your site to learn more about you and found it here. I'd like to comment on your post - without twitter's restriction on words.

    My reaction to your tweet wasn't based on some kind of "anti-natalist" philosophy. I've never even heard the term before and I certainly don't identify myself as such. I did some research and came across many and varied definitions of the term. Am I anti-birth, anti-child? Absolutely not - nothing could be further from the truth. Giving birth to my children was the most profound experience of my life. I love being around children and miss the days when mine were young.

    Do I believe having the ability to plan the number and timing of one's children is very important to the health and well-being of mothers and children everywhere? Yes, and if that makes me an anti-natalist, then guilty as charged. In my younger years I studied issues surrounding population growth and its impact on society and the environment, but it's been a long time since I've given much thought to these issues. I'm far too busy taking care of the everyday business of life. My reaction to your tweet came from the heart, not from facts and figures.

    I was touched by the story of this woman who survived the Holocaust and went on to live a long and full life, but it seems illogical to say she was a "world changer" and "hero" simply because she left behind 2000 descendents. I have no idea what kind of mother she was, do you? Was she kind and loving? Were her children happy and did they become productive citizens? Shouldn't that be the basis for our praise? Motherhood is not meant to be a competiton or numbers game where those with the greatest number of descendents "wins". That's what separates us from the "cats and rats", as I somewhat glibly put it.

    Am I someone who believes babies are "consequences to be avoided"? Let me share a little about myself. Forty years ago, I became a mother soon after my seventeenth birthday. I was shunned by my family, abandoned by the child's father and pressured to put the baby up for adoption but I never waivered from my decision to keep her. When my baby was born with Down's Syndrome, I was advised to put her in an institution and never look back because she would bring me nothing but heartbreak. I didn't even considered it and set out with my beautiful red-haired girl to make a life for us. It took years of hard work and sacrifice to build that life but I did. I eventually married and had another child who almost died as an infant due to an undiagnosed health condition. Years of medical interventions and long hospital stays followed - for both my children. My son is now well and on his own but I continue to care for my daughter 24/7 due to her declining health.

    Do I sound like someone who has tried to avoid the consequences of having children? You shouldn't be so quick to judge people whose opinions differ from yours, especially when those opinions were delivered in 145 characters or less.


    Candice Watters

    Debra, Thank You!! for stopping by to not only comment but share your story. Twitter is good for many things, but providing room for details isn't one of them! Bless you for your commitment to your children and your beautiful example of sacrificial love.

    You're right, of course, that numbers alone don't equal fruitfulness. Our message isn't "make babies anyway you can," BUT "make babies for God's glory!" That makes all the difference.

    Still, in this day where so many people see babies as consequences to be avoided, I was delighted to see what's possible when a mother embraces the gift of children--as many as God sends. The NYT article did more to flesh out the story of this family's life and impact on their community.

    Again, thank you for taking the time to explain your tweet. I'm so glad you did!

    Julie

    I'm with Debra on this! Someone may only have one child but may be "one heck of a mother" while a mother of ten might not put the same time and/or conscientious style of parenting in...It is about quality of relationships. I read Start Your Family, and I agree with aspects and disagree with other aspects. One great point of Start Your Family was the importance of simplifying...I agree with that

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

    Get The Book

    About Us

    • Starting a family is a soul-shaping, world-altering experience. Unfortunately, in a culture of competing values and protracted timelines, couples are increasingly backing their way into parenting or missing it altogether. By the time the average couple tries to have kids, they are often beyond their late twenties and surprised to learn they're sliding past the peak of their fertile years.

      In Start Your Family, Steve and Candice Watters encourage couples to be intentional about their timeline in the early years of marriage and to trust God to help them boldly launch their families. Responding to the most common doubts and hurdles, they offer biblical inspiration for the questions, "Why have kids?," "When is the best time to start?" and "How can we fit kids into our lives?"